Performance Versus Complexity Study of Neural Network Equalizers in Coherent Optical Systems

We present the results of the comparative performance-versus-complexity analysis for the several types of artificial neural networks (NNs) used for nonlinear channel equalization in coherent optical communication systems. The comparison is carried out using an experimental set-up with the transmission dominated by the Kerr nonlinearity and component imperfections. For the first time, we investigate the application to the channel equalization of the convolution layer (CNN) in combination with a bidirectional long short-term memory (biLSTM) layer and the design combining CNN with a multi-layer perceptron. Their performance is compared with the one delivered by the previously proposed NN-based equalizers: one biLSTM layer, three-dense-layer perceptron, and the echo state network. Importantly, all architectures have been initially optimized by a Bayesian optimizer. First, we present the general expressions for the computational complexity associated with each NN type; these are given in terms of real multiplications per symbol. We demonstrate that in the experimental system considered, the convolutional layer coupled with the biLSTM (CNN+biLSTM) provides the largest Q-factor improvement compared to the reference linear chromatic dispersion compensation (2.9 dB improvement). Then, we examine the trade-off between the computational complexity and performance of all equalizers and demonstrate that the CNN+biLSTM is the best option when the computational complexity is not constrained, while when we restrict the complexity to some lower levels, the three-layer perceptron provides the best performance.

Automated summary

The study compared the performance and complexity of different artificial neural networks for nonlinear channel equalization in coherent optical communication systems. The CNN+biLSTM architecture showed the largest Q-factor improvement and was the best option when computational complexity was not constrained. However, when complexity was restricted to lower levels, the three-layer perceptron performed best.