4.4 Article

Deep learning speeds up ice flow modelling by several orders of magnitude

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 270, Pages 651-664

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2021.120

Keywords

Glacier flow; glacier modelling; ice dynamics; ice velocity

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200021-162444]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_162444] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a model called Instructed Glacier Model (IGM), which simulates ice dynamics using a Convolutional Neural Network and a cheap emulator trained from data. It can predict the evolution of glaciers accurately and efficiently.
This paper introduces the Instructed Glacier Model (IGM) - a model that simulates ice dynamics, mass balance and its coupling to predict the evolution of glaciers, icefields or ice sheets. The novelty of IGM is that it models the ice flow by a Convolutional Neural Network, which is trained from data generated with hybrid SIA + SSA or Stokes ice flow models. By doing so, the most computationally demanding model component is substituted by a cheap emulator. Once trained with representative data, we demonstrate that IGM permits to model mountain glaciers up to 1000 x faster than Stokes ones on Central Processing Units (CPU) with fidelity levels above 90% in terms of ice flow solutions leading to nearly identical transient thickness evolution. Switching to the GPU often permits additional significant speed-ups, especially when emulating Stokes dynamics or/and modelling at high spatial resolution. IGM is an open-source Python code which deals with two-dimensional (2-D) gridded input and output data. Together with a companion library of trained ice flow emulators, IGM permits user-friendly, highly efficient and mechanically state-of-the-art glacier and icefields simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available