An impact assessment tool to identify, quantify and select optimal social-economic, ecological and health outcomes of civic environmental management interventions, in Durban South Africa
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
An impact assessment tool to identify, quantify and select optimal social-economic, ecological and health outcomes of civic environmental management interventions, in Durban South Africa
Authors
Keywords
Ecosystem services, Environmental management, Civic ecology, Social-ecological system, Sustainable development, Environmental impact assessment
Journal
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages 113966
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-11-08
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113966
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Mapping the socio-ecological impacts of invasive plants in South Africa: Are poorer households with high ecosystem service use most at risk?
- (2020) Chevonne Reynolds et al. Ecosystem Services
- Assessing nature's contributions to people
- (2018) Sandra Díaz et al. SCIENCE
- Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?
- (2017) Robert Costanza et al. Ecosystem Services
- Opportunities and constraints for community-based conservation: The case of the KwaZulu-Natal Sandstone Sourveld grassland, South Africa
- (2016) Sizwe S. Nkambule et al. BOTHALIA
- Identifying ecosystem service hotspots for environmental management in Durban, South Africa
- (2016) Rashieda Davids et al. BOTHALIA
- Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
- (2016) Carl Folke et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- Advances and challenges of incorporating ecosystem services into impact assessment
- (2016) Josianne Claudia Sales Rosa et al. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use
- (2015) Maike Hamann et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
- (2015) W. Steffen et al. SCIENCE
- The roles of land tenure reforms and land markets in the context of population growth and land use intensification in Africa
- (2014) Stein T. Holden et al. FOOD POLICY
- Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems
- (2014) John A. Dearing et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Civic ecology practices: Participatory approaches to generating and measuring ecosystem services in cities
- (2013) Marianne E. Krasny et al. Ecosystem Services
- A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities
- (2012) Vanesa Castán Broto et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Cities and biodiversity: Perspectives and governance challenges for implementing the convention on biological diversity (CBD) at the city level
- (2011) J.A. Puppim de Oliveira et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Ecosystem Management: Tomorrow’s Approach to Enhancing Food Security under a Changing Climate
- (2011) Richard Tingem Munang et al. Sustainability
- Contribution of non-timber forest products to livelihoods of communities in southeast Nigeria
- (2010) Eugene E. Ezebilo et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY
- Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
- (2009) R.S. de Groot et al. Ecological Complexity
- An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development
- (2008) H. Tallis et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started