4.4 Article

Nano-hybridization effects of nano-silica and nano-graphene platelet on mechanical properties of E-glass/epoxy nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 779-796

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00219983211065211

Keywords

nano-hybridization; nano-silica; nano-graphene platelets; nanocomposites; mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of nano-hybridization on the mechanical properties, failure behaviors, and fracture mechanisms of E-glass/epoxy composites. The experimental results show that nano-hybridization significantly improves the strength and toughness of the composite materials.
This study reveals the nano-hybridization effects of nano-graphene platelets (NGPs) and nano-silica (SiO2 nanoparticle), having different structural geometries on the mechanical properties, nano and micro-scale failure behaviors, and nanoscale fracture mechanisms of E-glass/epoxy composites. Tensile, three-point bending, and Charpy impact experiments were applied to determine the mechanical behaviors of 0.5 wt.% NGPs, 4 wt.% nano-silica and 0.5 wt.% NGPs + 4 wt.% nano-silica nanohybrid filled E-glass/epoxy and neat E-glass/epoxy composite samples. Failure of composite samples was examined by microscopy and SEM analysis. FTIR analyses were conducted to interpret the chemical and physical interactions between the nanoparticles and epoxy resin. Nano-hybridization exhibited the highest tensile strength and three-point flexural force for the composite samples. However, the NGPs filled nanocomposites also exhibited the best static tensile toughness and impact energy absorption. The experimental data showed that it was statistically significant as a result of the one-way ANOVA analysis. Remarkably, nano-hybridization of nano-silica and NGPs showed different fracture mechanisms at the nano and micro-scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available