4.3 Article

Magnetosensation during re-learning walks in desert ants (Cataglyphis nodus)

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01511-4

Keywords

Landmark panorama; Learning and memory; Magnetic compass; Navigation; Path integration

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [FL1060/1-1, RO1177/7 - 1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calaglyphis desert ants calibrate their compass systems and learn visual panoramas at the beginning of foraging careers, using structured initial learning walks and re-learning walks. Foragers and novices show differences in compass cues and behaviors, but remain magnetosensitive in cue conflict situations under manipulated panorama conditions.
At the beginning of their foraging careers, Cataglyphis desert ants calibrate their compass systems and learn the visual panorama surrounding the nest entrance. For that, they perform well-structured initial learning walks. During rotational body movements (pirouettes), naive ants (novices) gaze back to the nest entrance to memorize their way back to the nest. To align their gaze directions, they rely on the geomagnetic field as a compass cue. In contrast, experienced ants (foragers) use celestial compass cues for path integration during food search. If the panorama at the nest entrance is changed, foragers perform re-learning walks prior to heading out on new foraging excursions. Here, we show that initial learning walks and re-learning walks are structurally different. During re-learning walks, foragers circle around the nest entrance before leaving the nest area to search for food. During pirouettes, they do not gaze back to the nest entrance. In addition, foragers do not use the magnetic field as a compass cue to align their gaze directions during re-learning walk pirouettes. Nevertheless, magnetic alterations during re-learning walks under manipulated panoramic conditions induce changes in nest-directed views indicating that foragers are still magnetosensitive in a cue conflict situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available