Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Authors
Keywords
Research quality, Methodology, Reporting
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 219-226
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-05-31
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- COVID-19 coronavirus research has overall low methodological quality thus far: case in point for chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine
- (2020) Paul Elias Alexander et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Data-sharing recommendations in biomedical journals and randomised controlled trials: an audit of journals following the ICMJE recommendations
- (2020) Maximilian Siebert et al. BMJ Open
- Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
- (2020) Laure Wynants et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities
- (2020) Danielle B Rice et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- (2020) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey
- (2020) Tom E. Hardwicke et al. PLoS One
- COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
- (2019) Ben Goldacre et al. Trials
- Harms From Uninformative Clinical Trials
- (2019) Deborah A. Zarin et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- What’s next for Registered Reports?
- (2019) Chris Chambers NATURE
- Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review
- (2019) Matthew Vassar et al. BMJ Open
- The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding
- (2019) Sandra Bendiscioli EMBO REPORTS
- Spin in Scientific Publications: A Frequent Detrimental Research Practice
- (2019) Isabelle Boutron ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Universal Funder Responsibilities That Advance Social Value
- (2018) Barbara E. Bierer et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- The ego has landed! What can be done about research misconduct, scandals and spins?
- (2018) David R. Thompson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians
- (2018) Min Qi Wang et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
- (2018) Paul Glasziou et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2017) Bram Duyx et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
- (2016) David Moher et al. LANCET
- Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
- (2016) Andrew D. Higginson et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- (2016) Mark D. Wilkinson et al. Scientific Data
- Bridging Clinical Investigators and Statisticians
- (2016) Beverley Adams-Huet et al. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE
- Reporting of a Publicly Accessible Protocol and Its Association With Positive Study Findings in Cardiovascular Trials (from the Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials [ESORT])
- (2015) Ayodele Odutayo et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
- (2015) Daniele Fanelli et al. PLoS One
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
- (2015) Y. Yordanov et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
- (2015) Y. Yordanov et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- Fate of Clinical Research Studies after Ethical Approval – Follow-Up of Study Protocols until Publication
- (2014) Anette Blümle et al. PLoS One
- The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study
- (2014) P. Sumner et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols
- (2014) George Peat et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
- (2013) Jelena Savović et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Empirical Evaluation of Very Large Treatment Effects of Medical Interventions
- (2012) Tiago V. Pereira et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started