Minimal Clinically Important Changes in HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 Scores Following Joint Replacement

Implications for research and clinical use from a Rasch analysis of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments

(2021) Soh Sze-Ee et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

Performance of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments for evaluating outcomes from joint replacement surgery

(2021) Ilana N. Ackerman et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

Minimal important change and minimum clinically important difference values of the KOOS-12 after total knee arthroplasty

(2021) Lukas Eckhard et al.   KNEE

Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders

(2021) Ron D. Hays et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-acceptable Symptom State Score for Disability Assessment in Surgical Patients

(2020) Mark A. Shulman et al.   ANESTHESIOLOGY

A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

(2019) B. Gandek et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials

(2019) Susan M. Goodman et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?

(2018) Stephen Lyman et al.   CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

(2018) B. Gandek et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

Item selection for 12-item short forms of the knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12)

(2018) B. Gandek et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients

(2017) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis

(2015) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus

(2015) Sharan K Rai et al.   ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) and Its Shortened Version (QuickDASH)

(2013) Franco Franchignoni et al.   JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods

(2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY