4.1 Article

Impact of deep learning reconstruction on intracranial 1.5 T magnetic resonance angiography

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 476-483

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-021-01225-2

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Magnetic resonance angiography; Head

Funding

  1. Canon Medical Systems Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the impact of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on the image quality of intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T, demonstrating significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for DLR images compared to non-DLR images. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses showed improved visualization of arteries with DLR, suggesting its potential in enhancing the quality of 1.5 T intracranial MRA images.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) improves the image quality of intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 1.5 T. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, MRA images of 40 patients (21 males and 19 females; mean age, 65.8 +/- 13.2 years) were reconstructed with and without the DLR technique (DLR image and non-DLR image, respectively). Quantitative image analysis was performed by placing regions of interest on the basilar artery and cerebrospinal fluid in the prepontine cistern. We calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for analyses of the basilar artery. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the depiction of structures (the right internal carotid artery, right ophthalmic artery, basilar artery, and right superior cerebellar artery), artifacts, subjective noise and overall image quality in a qualitative image analysis. Scores were compared in the quantitative and qualitative image analyses between the DLR and non-DLR images using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results The SNR and CNR for the basilar artery were significantly higher for the DLR images than for the non-DLR images (p < 0.001). Qualitative image analysis scores (p < 0.003 and p < 0.005 for readers 1 and 2, respectively), excluding those for artifacts (p = 0.072-0.565), were also significantly higher for the DLR images than for the non-DLR images. Conclusion DLR enables the production of higher quality 1.5 T intracranial MRA images with improved visualization of arteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available