4.7 Review

A strategic roadmap for large-scale green hydrogen demonstration and commercialisation in China: A review and survey analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 47, Issue 58, Pages 24592-24609

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.077

Keywords

Green hydrogen; Large-scale application; China; Strategy; Policy framework; Roadmap

Funding

  1. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, Indonesia [ERIARD/RE-1-1-2004/03/FY20]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72174056, 71828401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims at bridging the gaps in China's hydrogen energy development by surveying experts and formulating a strategic roadmap for large-scale green hydrogen demonstrations. The corresponding policies are evaluated and selected to form a systemic framework.
Hydrogen is gaining increased attention from industries and policymakers in China. However, most of the current demonstration projects in the country have relied on conventional energy sources, including industrial byproduct hydrogen and grey hydrogen produced from fossil fuels. Moreover, strategies and policy frameworks leading to a shift to green or low-carbon hydrogen have neither been explored in-depth nor been identified clearly in the context of China. This study aims at bridging such gaps. Roadmapping techniques enhanced by the Delphi method and SWOT analysis are used to survey hydrogen energy experts from government bodies, industries, and academia to achieve basic agreement on strategically enabling large-scale green hydrogen demonstrations followed by commercialisation in China. The outcome of two rounds of surveys showed that experts' opinions converged on a strategic roadmap with three stages of development. The corresponding policies needed in each stage are evaluated and selected to form a systemic framework. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available