4.7 Article

Narrow is normal: Exploring the extent and significance of flooded marine shelves in icehouse, transitional, and greenhouse climate settings

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 496-499

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G49468.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study found that greenhouse marine shelves were narrower than icehouse marine shelves due to lower rates of accommodation change during greenhouse climate intervals. Since greenhouse climates have dominated Earth's history, narrow shelves are likely to be the dominant form, and conceptual models based on modern relatively wide shelves may be poor predictors for paleogeography, sediment routing, and sediment partitioning throughout much of Earth's history.
Marine shelves are a ubiquitous feature of modern Earth, developed across a wide range of scales in many sedimentary basins and representing the flooded portion of basin-margin clinoform topsets. Analysis of 80 clinoforms from 10 basins spanning Cenozoic and Mesozoic icehouse, transitional, and greenhouse climate settings indicates that normalized mean green-house marine shelf width is 33% of normalized mean total measured clinoform topset length. The equivalent value for transitional settings is 43%, and 72% for icehouse marine shelves. These values demonstrate that greenhouse marine shelves were substantially narrower than icehouse equivalents, suggesting that narrower shelves with persistent shelf-edge deltas were a consequence of lower rates of accommodation change in greenhouse climate intervals that lacked the large ice sheets required to drive high-amplitude high-frequency glacio-eustasy. Because greenhouse climates have been the dominant mode through Earth history, narrow shelves have probably been the dominant form, and conceptual models based on modern relatively wide shelves may be poor predictors of paleogeography, sediment routing, and sediment partitioning throughout much of Earth history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available