4.5 Article

Adaptive Resolution Imaging Sonar (ARIS) as a tool for marine fish identification

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106092

Keywords

Acoustic cameras; ARIS 3000; Environmental management; Fish identification; Biodiversity assessments

Categories

Funding

  1. Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarships (KESS)
  2. Welsh Government's European Social Fund (ESF)
  3. Ocean Ecology Ltd
  4. European Regional Development funding through the SEACAMS 2 project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that the high-frequency ARIS hydroacoustic system has a certain level of accuracy in underwater species identification, but is limited by factors such as species size and morphological traits. Monitoring techniques should combine the use of ARIS sonars alongside other sampling tools.
Assessment and monitoring of marine biodiversity, including fish populations, is essential for evidence-based conservation management of coastal marine resources. The effectiveness of monitoring techniques for stock assessment varies with sea conditions. In dynamic marine environments with high turbidity, such as those found in estuaries, mangroves, coastal straits, fjords, and bays, traditional assessment methods include the use of destructive techniques such as trawling. Hydroacoustic sampling techniques overcome such restrictions, equipment such as echosounders have commonly been used for biodiversity assessments including fish community structure, biomass, behaviour, and dynamics studies. However, hydroacoustic methods have been shown to be less reliable for species identification. The high frequency Adaptive Resolution Imaging Sonar (ARIS) is widely used for underwater object detection and imaging. Our study investigated the suitability of ARIS 3000 for the species identification of North-East Atlantic marine species using experimental aquarium studies, field surveys and multi investigator assessments. Aquaria results showed that 82 % of species were detected by observers, of which five were identified correctly identified consistently. The remaining four species were identified correctly <67 % of the time. During field surveys, a 150 % higher confidence in identification was given to more morphologically distinct groups such as elasmobranchs. Whilst our results highlight the suitability of the ARIS for accurate and repeatable identification of some of the model species used in this study, we have also shown that factors such as size and morphological traits limit the accuracy of identification for all species. We suggest that monitoring techniques combine the use of ARIS sonars alongside other sampling tools for assessing motile faunal communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available