4.2 Article

Gently does it!: in situ preparation of alkali metal-solid electrolyte interfaces for photoelectron spectroscopy

Journal

FARADAY DISCUSSIONS
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 267-287

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1fd00118c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Faraday Institution through Characterisation project [FIRG011, FIRG020]
  2. Faraday Institution through SOLBAT project [FIRG026]
  3. Faraday Institution through LiSTAR project [FIRG014]
  4. Henry Royce Institute (through the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council) [EP/R010145/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at buried electrode-electrolyte interfaces, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. This study investigates the deposition of thin alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces to better understand their stability and reactions. The results show that different alkali metal deposition methods can have different effects on the interfaces, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate methods for in situ studies.
The key charge transfer processes in electrochemical energy storage devices occur at electrode-electrolyte interfaces, which are typically buried, making it challenging to access their interfacial chemistry. In the case of Li-ion batteries, metallic Li electrodes hold promise for increasing energy and power densities and, when used in conjunction with solid electrolytes, the adverse safety implications associated with dendrite formation in organic liquid electrolytes can potentially be overcome. To better understand the stability of solid electrolytes when in contact with alkali metals and the reactions that occur, here we consider the deposition of thin (similar to 10 nm) alkali metal films onto solid electrolyte surfaces, where the metal is thin enough that X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy can probe the buried electrode-electrolyte interface. We highlight the importance of in situ alkali metal deposition by assessing the contaminant species that are present after glovebox handling and the use of 'inert' transfer devices. Consequently, we compare and contrast three available methods for in situ alkali-metal deposition; Li sputter deposition, Li evaporation, and Li plating induced by e(-) flood-gun irradiation. Studies on both a sulphide solid electrolyte (Li6PS5Cl), and a single-layer graphene probe surface reveal that the more energetic Li deposition methods, such as sputtering, can induce surface damage and interfacial mixing that are not seen with thermal evaporation. This indicates that the appropriate selection of the Li deposition method for in situ studies is required to observe representative behaviour, and the results of previous studies involving energetic deposition may warrant further evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available