4.3 Review

The infection risks of JAK inhibition

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 253-261

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2014323

Keywords

Adults; Adverse events; inflammatory disease; JAK inhibitors; older adults; serious infections; tuberculosis; vaccination; varicella zoster

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Licensed JAK inhibitors have shown increased risk of infection compared to placebo, affecting respiratory and urinary tracts, nasopharynx, and skin. This risk is dose-dependent and similar to that seen with biologic therapies. Other risk factors for infection, such as age and steroid co-prescription, further compound the risk.
Introduction Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. As with all immunomodulatory therapies, careful assessment of any treatment-associated infection risk is essential to inform clinical decision-making. Areas covered We summarize current literature on infection rates among the licensed JAKi using published phase II/III trial results, post-licensing and registry data. Expert opinion licensed JAKi show increased risk of infection across the class compared to placebo, most commonly affecting respiratory and urinary tracts, nasopharynx and skin. This risk is dose-dependent. Risks are similar at licensed JAKi doses to that seen with biologic therapies. The risk is compounded by other risk factors for infection, such as age and steroid co-prescription. Herpes zoster reactivation is more common with JAKi compared to other targeted immune modulation, making screening for varicella exposure and vaccination in appropriate cohorts an advisable strategy. Crucially, these small risk increases must be balanced against the known harms (including infection) of uncontrolled autoimmune disease. JAKi are a safe and potentially transformative treatment when used for appropriately selected patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available