FUSE-ML: development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for mid-term outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative disease
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
FUSE-ML: development and external validation of a clinical prediction model for mid-term outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative disease
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-02-21
DOI
10.1007/s00586-022-07135-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Prediction Models in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
- (2021) Daniel Lubelski et al. Global Spine Journal
- Development and validation of a prediction tool for pain reduction in adult patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion: a multicentre cohort study
- (2020) Esther R. C. Janssen et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- 15. Use of predictive machine learning models at the population level has the potential to save cost by directing economic resources to those likely to improve most: a simulation analysis stratified by risk in largest combined US/European ASD registry
- (2020) Rushikesh S. Joshi et al. Spine Journal
- A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
- (2019) Evangelia Christodoulou et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- External validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcome after elective lumbar spinal fusion
- (2019) Ayesha Quddusi et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Identifying subsets of patients with single-level degenerative disc disease for lumbar fusion: the value of prognostic tests in surgical decision making
- (2018) Victor E. Staartjes et al. Spine Journal
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery
- (2018) Sara Khor et al. JAMA Surgery
- Value of Adding Predictive Clinical Decision Tools to Spine Surgery
- (2018) Michael P. Steinmetz et al. JAMA Surgery
- Independent predictors of a clinically significant improvement after lumbar fusion surgery
- (2017) Vincent J. Alentado et al. Spine Journal
- Surgeon Perception of Risk and Benefit in the Decision to Operate
- (2016) Greg D. Sacks et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine—a Spine Tango registry-based study
- (2016) Miranda L. van Hooff et al. Spine Journal
- Consensus at last! Long-term results of all randomized controlled trials show that fusion is no better than non-operative care in improving pain and disability in chronic low back pain
- (2016) Anne F. Mannion et al. Spine Journal
- What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
- (2016) Tamas F. Fekete et al. Spine Journal
- Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
- (2015) G. S. Collins et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
- (2015) G. S. Collins et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Building Predictive Models inRUsing thecaretPackage
- (2015) Max Kuhn Journal of Statistical Software
- External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting
- (2014) Gary S Collins et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study
- (2014) Stéphane Genevay et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Decision Making in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: The performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion
- (2013) Paul Willems Acta Orthopaedica
- Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
- (2011) Scott L. Parker et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index
- (2009) A. F. Mannion et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain
- (2009) Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo et al. SPINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started