4.5 Article

The effects of ageing treatment on bioactive contents and chemical composition of liquid smoke food flavourings

Journal

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 248, Issue 5, Pages 1311-1319

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-022-03976-2

Keywords

Liquid smoke; Flavouring; Ageing; Stability; Principal component analysis

Funding

  1. University of Auckland FRDF [3719621]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid smoke food flavouring is an alternative to traditional food smoking. This study proposed a thermal treatment approach to accelerate the ageing process of liquid smoke. It was found that a thermal treatment at 80 degrees C for 24 hours was sufficient to age liquid smoke.
Liquid smoke food flavouring is an alternative to traditional food smoking. Ageing treatment of liquid smoke can remove tar to improve a consistent sensory experience but traditionally takes months by storage. This study proposed a thermal treatment approach to accelerate the ageing process. Liquid smoke samples from kanuka and hickory woodchips were prepared by fast pyrolysis. The obtained liquid smoke samples were subjected to ageing by storing them at ambient temperature for 18 months. Accelerated ageing of liquid smoke was carried out by heat treatment at 80 degrees C for 24 and 48 h. Tar formed during the ageing process, with a yield ranging from 2.2 to 4.1 wt.%. Both ageing treatments resulted in decreases in bioactive content and their activities in terms of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity (DPPH). Chemical composition and principal component analyses indicated that liquid smoke chemical compositions were influenced by wood type and ageing conditions. It was found that thermal treatment at 80 degrees C for 24 h was sufficient to age liquid smoke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available