4.7 Article

Joint Patch and Multi-label Learning for Facial Action Unit and Holistic Expression Recognition

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 3931-3946

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2570550

Keywords

Patch learning; multi-label learning; group sparsity; support vector machine; ADMM; facial expression recognition; facial action unit detection; correlation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1418520-L, IIS 1418026]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health [MH096951]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [R21 MH099487-01A1]
  4. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications through the Excellent Ph.D. Students Foundation
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1418026] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1418520] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most action unit (AU) detection methods use one-versus-all classifiers without considering dependences between features or AUs. In this paper, we introduce a joint patch and multi-label learning (JPML) framework that models the structured joint dependence behind features, AUs, and their interplay. In particular, JPML leverages group sparsity to identify important facial patches, and learns a multi-label classifier constrained by the likelihood of co-occurring AUs. To describe such likelihood, we derive two AU relations, positive correlation and negative competition, by statistically analyzing more than 350,000 video frames annotated with multiple AUs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that jointly addresses patch learning and multi-label learning for AU detection. In addition, we show that JPML can be extended to recognize holistic expressions by learning common and specific patches, which afford a more compact representation than the standard expression recognition methods. We evaluate JPML on three benchmark datasets CK+, BP4D, and GFT, using within- and cross-dataset scenarios. In four of five experiments, JPML achieved the highest averaged F1 scores in comparison with baseline and alternative methods that use either patch learning or multi-label learning alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available