4.3 Article

The Brazilian Caatinga protected areas: an extremely unbalanced conservation system

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 287-294

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892921000308

Keywords

environmental protected areas; jurisdiction; Neotropics; Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests; strictly protected reserves; sustainable use reserves

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [308040/2017-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the Caatinga protected areas with other Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests and Woodlands in the Neotropics, finding that the protected area percentage in Caatinga is average, but facing threats such as human use, exotic species, and global warming.
The semiarid Caatinga is the largest Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest and Woodland (SDTFW) in the Neotropics. Yet the vast majority of the Caatinga is unprotected, with severe chronic anthropogenic use, exotic species and global warming among its most immediate threats. Here, we contrast the current Caatinga protected areas (PAs) scenery with that of other SDTFWs in the Neotropics. We also analyse the growth process of the PAs in the Caatinga over time across Brazilian PA categories and jurisdictions. The percentage of Caatinga that is protected is average among the SDTFWs. Caatinga has more state than federal PAs; however, the size of the PAs is greater under a federal jurisdiction. Nonetheless, in both jurisdictions, Environmental Protected Areas, one of the least restrictive categories, are more representative in terms of total area, corresponding to nearly 80% of the Caatinga PA system. Our results are relevant for international conservation goals because they depict the current PA scenery and clarify the challenges for achieving the actual preservation of the unique Caatinga biome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available