4.7 Review

Huff-n-Puff Technology for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale/Tight Oil Reservoirs: Progress, Gaps, and Perspectives

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 35, Issue 21, Pages 17279-17333

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02561

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research-Libya
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [R.J130000.3551.07G52, J130000.3551.06G68, R. J 1 30000.3551.06G69, R. J130000.2451.08G93, R. J130000.3051.01M99, R.J130000.7851.5F030, R.J130000.7351.4B545]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent times, there has been a significant increase in global energy demand, leading to the depletion of conventional oil reservoirs. To meet this growing energy demand, there has been a focus on seeking alternative oil resources, particularly unconventional oil formations like shale oil reservoirs. While shale oil reservoirs have been successful, challenges remain such as rapidly declining oil flow rates and oil retention in pores.
In recent times, particularly in the 21st century, there has been an alarming increase in the demand for global energy, along with continuous depletion in conventional oil reservoirs. This necessity has incentivized interested scholars and operators worldwide to seek alternative oil resources. To secure such accelerating energy demand, considerable effort has been directed toward the development of previously unconventional oil formations that, in past decades, had remained sidelined. Although shale oil reservoirs have seen tremendous success over the past decade, the continued challenges of rapidly declining oil flow rates and oil retention in the pores continuously persist. Substantial attempts have been made to improve shale-bypassed oil recovery; however, there is little data about the accessibility on recovery mechanisms, especially in the oil field. Furthermore, approaches-particularly, Huff-n-Puff (H-n-P) experiments using conventional procedures-fail to properly represent field conditions and they generate deceptive findings, because the utilized cores are not simulated under realistic reservoir conditions, leaving the significance of critical factors unclear. Therefore, this review study comprehensively and specifically discusses the feasibility of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in unconventional oil reservoirs. Beside addressing the validity of the currently applied H-n-P technology in shale/tight oil reservoirs and underlining some critical gaps regarding laboratory results, modified technology is proposed in this paper for a better field future performance. The study is divided into sections, and each section analyzes the role of one specific H-n-P portion in detail, such as preferable injected solvents, their mechanisms, and critical factors affecting H-n-P recovery. The exceptions to this are the first and second sections, which provide a brief introduction about shale and tight oil reservoirs, a history of applied technology, and the method's current problem statement. In the Introduction section, the authors will justify why this Review fills a critical gap in the field. Within the assessment study, great focus is given to the H-n-P technique, its parameters, and effective processes. In the final sections, carefully chosen experimental results and tools are reviewed to highlight the controversy and state the gap.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available