Climate Risk with Particular Emphasis on the Relationship with Credit-Risk Assessment: What We Learn from Poland

This research seeks to identify non-financial enterprises exposed to the climate risk relating to transition risks and at the same time use of bank loans, as well as to conduct stress tests to take account of the financial risk related to climate change. The workflow through which to determine the ability of the banking sector to assess the potential impact of climate risk entails parts based around economic sector and company level. The procedure based on the sectoral level identifies vulnerable economic sectors (in the Sectoral Module), while the procedure based on company level (the Company Module) refers to scenarios presented in stress tests to estimate the probability of default under stressful conditions related to the introduction of a direct carbon tax. The introduction of the average direct carbon tax (EUR 75/tCO(2)) in fact results in increased expenditure and reduced sales revenues among enterprises from sectors with a high CO2 impact, with the result being a decrease in the profitability of enterprises, along with a simultaneously higher level of debt; an increase in the probability of default (PD) from 3.6%, at the end of 2020 in the baseline macroeconomic scenario, to between 6.31% and 10.12%; and increased commercial bank capital requirements. Financial institutions should thus use PD under stressful conditions relating to climate risk as suggestions to downgrade under the expert module.

Automated summary

This research aims to identify non-financial enterprises exposed to climate risk and assess the financial impacts through stress tests. The introduction of a direct carbon tax is found to increase expenses, decrease sales revenues, reduce profitability, increase debt, and raise default probability for enterprises from high CO2 impact sectors. Financial institutions are advised to use these findings as a guide for managing climate risk under adverse conditions.