4.3 Article

Multi-omic analysis of altered transcriptome and epigenetic signatures in the UV-induced DNA damage response

Journal

DNA REPAIR
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103172

Keywords

DNA damage response; UV-irradiation; TC-NER; Gene expression; DNA methylation; m6A RNA methylation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571092]
  2. Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province of China [2020KTSCX099]
  3. Project of Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [202102080216]
  4. Talent Training Program of the Basic Medical College of Guangzhou Medical University [JCXKJS2021B01]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201707010319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed increased chromatin accessibility and the role of m6A RNA methylation in regulating translation during the DNA damage response process.
The transcription-related DNA damage response was visualized on a genome-wide scale with great spatial and temporal resolution. Upon UV irradiation, a small proportion of mature RNA transcripts undergo changes, with significant activation of DNA repair factors. Notably, an increase of chromatin accessibility is observed at the immediate early recovery phase and serves as binding sites for selective stage-specific transcription factors. Whole genome analysis of DNA methylation (5mC) delineates pervasive dynamics during DNA repair process, and hypomethylation at gene bodies and 3'UTR is accompanied by induction of DNA damage response genes. Furthermore, temporal-specific m6A RNA methylation has been defined and appears to affect DNA repair by modulation of translation. These findings provide a resource for identifying players required for transcriptioncoupled nucleotide excision repair and reveal insights into the epigenetic regulation of the transcriptional programs in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available