4.1 Review

Emerging biomarkers in kidney transplantation and challenge of clinical implementation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 15-21

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000941

Keywords

acute rejection; biomarkers; kidney transplantation; noninvasive monitoring

Funding

  1. Dr Dennis Ross Research Fund in Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite improvements in short-term outcomes post kidney transplantation, long-term outcomes are suboptimal. Novel molecular biomarkers are needed for reliable diagnosis and personalization of care for kidney transplant recipients. Recent advances have led to promising biomarker candidates, although challenges still exist in translating these biomarkers from bench to clinic.
Purpose of review Despite improvement in short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation, long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Conventional biomarkers are limited in their ability to reliably identify early immunologic and nonimmunologic injury. Novel biomarkers are needed for noninvasive diagnosis of subclinical injury, prediction of response to treatment, and personalization of the care of kidney transplant recipients. Recent findings Recent biotechnological advances have led to the discovery of promising molecular biomarker candidates. However, translating potential biomarkers from bench to clinic is challenging, and many potential biomarkers are abandoned prior to clinical implementation. Despite these challenges, several promising urine, blood, and tissue novel molecular biomarkers have emerged and are approaching incorporation into clinical practice. This article highlights the challenges in adopting biomarker-driven posttransplant management and reviews several promising emerging novel biomarkers that are approaching clinical implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available