4.5 Article

Array Organization and Data Management Exploration in Racetrack Memory

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 1041-1054

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2014.2360545

Keywords

Racetrack memory; MRAM; spintronic technology; magnetic domain wall; domain wall motion; last level cache; array organization; memory hierarchy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS-1311706, CNS-1342566]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1311706] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20151113068] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the descendant of spin-transfer random access memory (STT-RAM), racetrack memory technology saves data in magnetic domains along nanoscopic wires. Such a unique structure can achieve unprecedentedly high storage density meanwhile inheriting the promising features of STT-RAM, such as fast access speed, non-volatility, zero standby power, hardness to soft errors, and compatibility with CMOS technology. Moreover, the recent success in planar racetrack nanowire promised its fabrication feasibility and continuous scalability. In this paper, we investigate the design and optimization of racetrack memory as last-level cache by embracing design considerations across multiple abstraction layers, including the cell design, the array structure, the architecture organization, and the data management. The cross-layer optimization makes racetrack memory based last-level cache achieve 6.4 x reduction in area, 25 percent enhancement in system performance, and 62 percent saving in energy consumption, compared to STT-RAM cache design. Its benefit over SRAM technology is even more significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available