4.7 Article

Machine learning acceleration for nonlinear solvers applied to multiphase porous media flow

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113989

Keywords

Nonlinear solver; Machine learning; Numerical relaxation; Multiphase flows; Porous media

Funding

  1. Petrobras, Brazil
  2. NERC, UK [FAMOS NE/P017452/1]
  3. EPSRC, UK
  4. PREMIERE programme grant [EP/T000414/1]
  5. MUFFINS, UK grant [EP/P033180/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a machine learning approach to accelerate convergence of the nonlinear solver in multiphase flow problems, aiming to reduce computational cost by adjusting to system complexity/physics. By using dimensionless parameters for training and control, the method is simplified and can be applied to other reservoir models without the need for rerunning the training process.
A machine learning approach to accelerate convergence of the nonlinear solver in multiphase flow problems is presented here. The approach dynamically controls an acceleration method based on numerical relaxation. It is demonstrated in a Picard iterative solver but is applicable to other types of nonlinear solvers. The aim of the machine learning acceleration is to reduce the computational cost of the nonlinear solver by adjusting to the complexity/physics of the system. Using dimensionless parameters to train and control the machine learning enables the use of a simple two-dimensional layered reservoir for training, while also exploring a wide range of the parameter space. Hence, the training process is simplified and it does not need to be rerun when the machine learning acceleration is applied to other reservoir models. We show that the method can significantly reduce the number of nonlinear iterations without compromising the simulation results, including models that are considerably more complex than the training case. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available