Analyzing giant pituitary adenomas: An 8-year review (2012-2020) at a reference center in Brazil

Purpose: This study aimed to review the cases of giant adenomas that were operated on from 2012 to 2020 and to analyze the epidemiological profile, complications, and resection rates using the transseptal/transnasal endoscopy technique. We also compared the results with data from revised literature.Methods: This is an observational, retrospective study includes a review of the medical records of 26 patients diagnosed with giant adenomas (diameter > 4 cm or volume >10 cm3) who underwent 28 surgical procedures.Results: Of the 57 patients operated for pituitary adenoma, 26 (50.8%) had giant adenomas. The mean volume was 17.28 cm3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3359-26.2241). Moreover, 64.28% of the patients were graded Knosp 3 (p < 0.0001). Most cases were of nonsecretory adenomas (88.46%). Visual impairment was present in 89.2% of the patients and hormonal deficit and headache affected 53.5% of them. The visual impairment improved in 60% of the patients. The most common surgical complication was cerebrospinal fluid fistula (10.71%). Tumor resection > 90% was achieved in 53.56% of the cases, and the mean resection rate was 78.36% (95% CI, 71.316-87.956).Conclusions: The endoscopic endonasal technique is a good treatment option for giant adenomas, showing satisfactory optic apparatus decompression rates and a low incidence of complications when performed by surgeons with expertise in this approach.

Automated summary

This study reviewed cases of giant adenomas that were operated on from 2012 to 2020 and analyzed the epidemiological profile, complications, and resection rates using the transseptal/transnasal endoscopy technique. The results showed that the endoscopic endonasal technique is a good treatment option for giant adenomas, with satisfactory optic apparatus decompression rates and a low incidence of complications when performed by surgeons with expertise in this approach.