4.7 Article

Fluorine mass balance analysis of selected environmental samples from Norway

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131200

Keywords

Fluorine mass balance analysis per- and polyfluorinated substances extractable organofluorine surface water passive sampler sediment

Funding

  1. Norwegian Environment Agency
  2. Swedish Research Council FORMAS [2016-01158]
  3. Knowledge Foundation (KKS), Sweden [20160019]
  4. Formas [2016-01158] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the presence of unidentified organofluorine compounds (UOF) in environmental samples from lake Mjosa, river Alna, and sewage samples from Oslo. The findings revealed high concentrations of UOF in these samples, posing a potential health and environmental hazard due to their mostly unknown composition.
The presence of unidentified organofluorine compounds (UOF) has been investigated in recent publication, but their environmental occurrence is still poorly understood. Fluorine mass balance analysis was performed on environmental samples from lake Mjosa and river Alna (surface water (n = 9), sediment (n = 5) and fish liver (n = 4)) and sewage samples from Oslo (n = 5), to reveal to the fraction of UOF. In samples that had extractable organofluorine (EOF) concentrations above the limit of detection (LoD), more than 70% of their EOF could not be accounted for by the 37 PFAS monitored in this study. The surface water samples from lake Mjosa had EOF concentrations several times higher than what has been reported elsewhere in Nordic nations. The flux of EOF in river Alna and selected sewage pipes revealed that it was 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the flux of the measured PFAS. The elevated concentrations of EOF in all samples pose a potential health and environmental hazard, as their composition remains mostly unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available