4.7 Article

Synchronous bio-reduction of Uranium(VI) and Vanadium(V) in aquifer: Performance and mechanisms

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 288, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132539

Keywords

Uranium (VI); Vanadium (V); Bio-reduction; Microbial evolution; Groundwater

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [42022055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that using sodium acetate as the sole exogenous electron donor and carbon source under anaerobic conditions can simultaneously remove U(VI) and V(V), with different conditions affecting removal efficiencies. Characterization of column fillings revealed that U(VI) was precipitated to U(IV) and V(V) was reduced to insoluble V(IV), while changes in microbial community structure were observed.
Uranium and vanadium commonly co-exist in groundwater aquifer where uranium was smelted from vanadium tailings. However, little is known about interrelationships of U(VI) and V(V) during their bio-reduction processes. In this work, 92.7 +/- 1.52% U(VI) and 100% V(V) were simultaneously removed with sodium acetate as the sole exogenous electron donor and carbon source under anaerobic condition. Various conditions (i.e., increased uranium, reduced hydraulic retention time and acetate) were observed to affect removal efficiencies. Characterization of column fillings indicated that U(VI) was precipitated to U(IV) and V(V) was reduced to insoluble V (IV). Microbial community structure was observed to change, where Aquabacterium and Hydrogenophaga promoted bioreductions of U(VI) and V(V). Enriched Novosphingobium and Rhodobacter also played a vital role in reducing U(VI) and V(V). These findings could be used to study the biogeochemical fates of U(VI) and V(V) in the aquifer and to remediate groundwater co-contaminated by U(VI) and V(V).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available