4.8 Review

Second-Sphere Lattice Effects in Copper and Iron Zeolite Catalysis

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00915

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment [SPO 164153]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01DK031450]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-11474]
  4. Munger, Pollock, Reynolds, Robinson, Smith, and Yoedicke Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  5. Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  6. Research Foundation - Flanders [G0A0321N, 1276021N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Second-sphere interactions play a crucial role in the high activity and selectivity of transition-metal-exchanged zeolites, despite the differences in active-site structures compared to metalloenzymes.
Transition-metal-exchanged zeolites perform remarkable chemical reactions from low-temperature methane to methanol oxidation to selective reduction of NOx pollutants. As with metalloenzymes, metallozeolites have impressive reactivities that are controlled in part by interactions outside the immediate coordination sphere. These second-sphere effects include activating a metal site through enforcing an entatic state, controlling binding and access to the metal site with pockets and channels, and directing radical rebound vs cage escape. This review explores these effects with emphasis placed on but not limited to the selective oxidation of methane to methanol with a focus on copper and iron active sites, although other transition-metal-ion zeolite reactions are also explored. While the actual active-site geometric and electronic structures are different in the copper and iron metallozeolites compared to the metalloenzymes, their second-sphere interactions with the lattice or the protein environments are found to have strong parallels that contribute to their high activity and selectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available