4.7 Article

Pilot scale assessment of methane capture from low concentration sources to town gas specification by pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA)

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 427, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130810

Keywords

Methane; Pressure Swing Adsorption; Separation; Greenhouse Gas; ILZ; TMAY

Funding

  1. Global Innovation Linkage (GIL) - Department of Industry, Innovation and Science entitled 'Development of Unconventional Gas Technologies for Sustainable Energy Security'
  2. Early Career Researcher Grants Scheme - University of Melbourne entitled 'Production of High Purity Hydrogen from Mixed Pipeline Gases'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the feasibility of separating methane from low concentration sources using the PVSA method, achieving high purity CH4 product gas with reduced energy consumption.
Methane (CH4) is the second largest contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The separation of CH4 from nitrogen (N-2) is crucial for the capture of CH4 from low concentration sources, such as coal seam gas, to reduce GHG emissions. Pressure vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) provides a flexible and scalable method for CH4/N-2 separation. In this work, a novel adsorbent (ILZ) was used in a 112 kg scale PVSA pilot facility to test the feasibility of separating CH4 from low concentration sources (4.7-44.5%). A product purity of 44.5% CH4 and a methane recovery of 81% were achieved from a feed gas containing just 4.7% CH4 via a 3-stage PVSA process. Such a product gas can then be transported using pipelines and used for either power generation or 4T town gases in China. The total energy consumption was 133 kJ per mol CH4 captured, which is 85% lower than its heating value (similar to 880 kJ/mol). This study demonstrates that the capture of CH4 from large but low concentration sources incentivises GHG emissions reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available