4.7 Review

Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); a new frontier

Journal

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02407-8

Keywords

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); Tumor microenvironment (TME); Resistance; Combination therapy; Immune cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a promising therapeutic strategy with durable anti-tumor effects, but resistance to these inhibitors and treatment-related toxicities pose challenges to their clinical utility. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other treatments can effectively overcome tumor resistance.
Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has become a promising therapeutic strategy with encouraging therapeutic outcomes due to their durable anti-tumor effects. Though, tumor inherent or acquired resistance to ICIs accompanied with treatment-related toxicities hamper their clinical utility. Overall, about 60-70% of patients (e.g., melanoma and lung cancer) who received ICIs show no objective response to intervention. The resistance to ICIs mainly caused by alterations in the tumor microenvironment (TME), which in turn, supports angiogenesis and also blocks immune cell antitumor activities, facilitating tumor cells' evasion from host immunosurveillance. Thereby, it has been supposed and also validated that combination therapy with ICIs and other therapeutic means, ranging from chemoradiotherapy to targeted therapies as well as cancer vaccines, can capably compromise tumor resistance to immune checkpoint blocked therapy. Herein, we have focused on the therapeutic benefits of ICIs as a groundbreaking approach in the context of tumor immunotherapy and also deliver an overview concerning the therapeutic influences of the addition of ICIs to other modalities to circumvent tumor resistance to ICIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available