4.7 Review

Functional annotation of breast cancer risk loci: current progress and future directions

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 126, Issue 7, Pages 981-993

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01612-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Breast Cancer Now

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than 150 genomic regions associated with breast cancer risk have been identified, with the majority of causal variants mapping to noncoding DNA. Combining fine-scale mapping statistical data with more representative functional data may lead to a greater understanding of the mechanisms influencing an individual woman's risk of breast cancer.
Genome-wide association studies coupled with large-scale replication and fine-scale mapping studies have identified more than 150 genomic regions that are associated with breast cancer risk. Here, we review efforts to translate these findings into a greater understanding of disease mechanism. Our review comes in the context of a recently published fine-scale mapping analysis of these regions, which reported 352 independent signals and a total of 13,367 credible causal variants. The vast majority of credible causal variants map to noncoding DNA, implicating regulation of gene expression as the mechanism by which functional variants influence risk. Accordingly, we review methods for defining candidate-regulatory sequences, methods for identifying putative target genes and methods for linking candidate-regulatory sequences to putative target genes. We provide a summary of available data resources and identify gaps in these resources. We conclude that while much work has been done, there is still much to do. There are, however, grounds for optimism; combining statistical data from fine-scale mapping with functional data that are more representative of the normal at risk breast, generated using new technologies, should lead to a greater understanding of the mechanisms that influence an individual woman's risk of breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available