4.5 Article

Supervised machine learning model to predict oncotype DX risk category in patients over age 50

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 423-430

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06443-w

Keywords

Breast cancer; Recurrence score; Machine learning; Risk prediction

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to predict RS risk category in breast cancer patients over 50 years old using a machine learning model. The model showed high specificity in identifying eligible patients for whom chemotherapy could be omitted. Further external validation may allow for triaging patients for RS testing in resource-limited settings.
Purpose Routine use of the oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) in patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer is limited internationally by cost and availability. We created a supervised machine learning model using clinicopathologic variables to predict RS risk category in patients aged over 50 years. Methods From January 2012 to December 2018, we identified patients aged over 50 years with T1-2, ER+/HER2-, node-negative tumors. Clinicopathologic data and RS results were randomly split into training and validation cohorts. A random forest model with 500 trees was developed on the training cohort, using age, pathologic tumor size, histology, progesterone receptor (PR) expression, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and grade as predictors. We predicted risk category (low: RS <= 25, high: RS > 25) using the validation cohort. Results Of the 3880 tumors identified, 1293 tumors comprised the validation cohort in patients of median (IQR) age 62 years (56-68) with median (IQR) tumor size 1.2 cm (0.8-1.7). Most tumors were invasive ductal (80.3%) of low-intermediate grade (80.5%) without LVI (80.9%). PR expression was <= 20% in 27.3% of tumors. Specificity for identifying RS <= 25 was 96.3% (95% CI 95.0-97.4) and the negative predictive value was 92.9% (95% CI 91.2-94.4). Sensitivity and positive predictive value for predicting RS > 25 was lower (48.3 and 65.1%, respectively). Conclusion Our model was highly specific for identifying eligible patients aged over 50 years for whom chemotherapy can be omitted. Following external validation, it may be used to triage patients for RS testing, if predicted to be high risk, in resource-limited settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available