4.7 Article

Joint Optimization of Transmission Power Level and Packet Size for WSN Lifetime Maximization

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 5084-5094

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2548661

Keywords

Wireless sensor networks; network lifetime; mixed integer programming; transmission power control; data packet size; energy efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In pursuit of better energy efficiency and enhanced network lifetime in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), two crucial factors are data packet size and transmission power level. On one hand, smaller packet size reduces the overall impact of bit error rates on packet loss. However, the consequence of smaller packet size is fragmentation into more data packets and thereby dissipation of increased energy. Hence, there emerges a delicate engineering tradeoff in deciding the data packet size, where both low and high data packet size decisions lead to certain energy inefficiency issues. On the other hand, increasing transmission power level decreases packet loss probability, which is another decision variable to optimize for maximizing network lifetime. Joint consideration of these two factors exacerbates the complexity of the optimization problem for the objective of the network lifetime maximization. In this paper, we develop a realistic WSN link layer model built on top of the empirically verified energy dissipation characteristics of Mica2 motes and WSN channel models. We make use of the aforementioned link layer model to design a novel mixed integer programming (MIP) framework for the joint optimization of transmission power level and data packet size to take up the challenge introduced above. Numerical evaluations of the MIP framework with the analysis of the results over a large parameter space are performed to characterize the effects of joint optimization of packet size and power level on WSN lifetime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available