4.3 Article

Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials

Journal

BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 663-680

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202100081

Keywords

cluster randomized trials; eigenvalues; extended nested exchangeable correlation; matrix-adjusted estimating equations (MAEE); sample size

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-MH120649]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article develops methods for sample size and power calculations in four-level intervention studies, with a focus on cluster randomized trials (CRTs). It considers intraclass correlations between different evaluations in multilevel CRTs and derives closed-form sample size formulas. The study demonstrates that empirical power corresponds well with predicted power using the proposed method.
In this article, we develop methods for sample size and power calculations in four-level intervention studies when intervention assignment is carried out at any level, with a particular focus on cluster randomized trials (CRTs). CRTs involving four levels are becoming popular in healthcare research, where the effects are measured, for example, from evaluations (level 1) within participants (level 2) in divisions (level 3) that are nested in clusters (level 4). In such multilevel CRTs, we consider three types of intraclass correlations between different evaluations to account for such clustering: that of the same participant, that of different participants from the same division, and that of different participants from different divisions in the same cluster. Assuming arbitrary link and variance functions, with the proposed correlation structure as the true correlation structure, closed-form sample size formulas for randomization carried out at any level (including individually randomized trials within a four-level clustered structure) are derived based on the generalized estimating equations approach using the model-based variance and using the sandwich variance with an independence working correlation matrix. We demonstrate that empirical power corresponds well with that predicted by the proposed method for as few as eight clusters, when data are analyzed using the matrix-adjusted estimating equations for the correlation parameters with a bias-corrected sandwich variance estimator, under both balanced and unbalanced designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available