4.5 Article

Simulation-based methodology to assess the lattice defects creation as energy storing process

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108691

Keywords

Wigner effect; Energy-storing; Displacement per Atom; OpenMC Monte Carlo code; Molecular Dynamics

Funding

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
  2. Argonne National Laboratory by Office of Science, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the potential of the Wigner effect as an energy-storing process in the nuclear industry, using a graphite-moderated Molten Salt Reactor as a test case. Through neutron and molecular dynamics simulations, a more accurate estimate of radiation damage and the proportion of neutron energy that can be stored were obtained.
In nuclear industry, damages caused to in-core structural materials by high-energy neutrons have been studied for years. Recently, the possibility of storing energy through the creation of defects in crystalline materials via heavy particle bombardment was investigated. To evaluate the potential of the Wigner effect as energy-storing process, a graphite-moderated Molten Salt Reactor was adopted as a test case. Neutronics simulations performed with OpenMC Monte Carlo code allowed estimating the amount of energy released during fission events, the fraction that is deposited in graphite, and the fraction that has the potential to cause radiation damages. Molecular dynamics simulations were then performed to study the evolution of cascades triggered by high-energy neutrons. As a major outcome, a more accurate estimate of the radiation damage with respect to the traditional approaches was obtained, and the fraction of the deposited neutron energy that can be stored through long-lived defects was quantified. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available