4.6 Article

Opioids and Public Health: The Prescription Opioid Ecosystem and Need for Improved Management

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages 10-30

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004065

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) [R01 DA042985]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs (Washington, D.C.) [I01 BX000881]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While opioid prescribing in the US has decreased, opioid deaths have increased significantly. This article reviews recent opioid policies and strategies and highlights the need for new approaches to opioid management. It introduces the concept of an opioid ecosystem and discusses factors that influence the size of the opioid pool. The article emphasizes the urgent policy needs for proper opioid stewardship and the importance of making opioid returns as common as opioid prescribing.
While U.S. opioid prescribing has decreased 38% in the past decade, opioid deaths have increased 300%. This opioid paradox is poorly recognized. Current approaches to opioid management are not working, and new approaches are needed. This article reviews the outcomes and shortcomings of recent U.S. opioid policies and strategies that focus primarily or exclusively on reducing or eliminating opioid prescribing. It introduces concepts of a prescription opioid ecosystem and opioid pool, and it discusses how the pool can be influenced by supply-side, demand-side, and opioid returns factors. It illuminates pressing policy needs for an opioid ecosystem that enables proper opioid stewardship, identifies associated responsibilities, and emphasizes the necessity of making opioid returns as easy and common as opioid prescribing, in order to minimize the size of the opioid pool available for potential diversion, misuse, overdose, and death. Approaches are applicable to opioid prescribing in general, and to opioid prescribing after surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available