4.7 Article

Signature Analysis of Building Damage With TerraSAR-X New Staring SpotLight Mode Data

Journal

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages 1696-1700

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2604841

Keywords

Damaged building; earthquake; high resolution; synthetic aperture radar (SAR); TerraSAR-X (TSX)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371413]
  2. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41331176]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2013, the TerraSAR-X (TSX) mission was extended by implementing two new modes, including Staring Spot-Light (ST). The azimuth resolution of this mode is significantly increased to approximately 0.24 m by widening the azimuth beam steering angle range. In this letter, five types of damaged buildings due to earthquake are analyzed using TSX images in the new ST mode. In particular, the characteristics of the individual damaged buildings are investigated using the new very high-resolution images. The old Beichuan County is selected as the research area, where most of the buildings damaged by the earthquake on May 12, 2008 have been preserved. Moreover, buildings with different types of damage can be found in the study area. Features such as backscattering and texture measurements of the damaged buildings in descending and ascending post-earthquake HH and VV polarization synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images are analyzed. Visual interpretation, statistical comparison, and classification experiments are performed for the damaged building analysis. Based on the analysis, the TSX ST mode images show potential for building damage detection and for discrimination of basic damage classes. In addition, the classification results show that the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) second moment, the variance of backscattering, and the GLCM homogeneity are the three best features for the discrimination of damage type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available