4.7 Article

Stability in BMI over time is associated with a better cognitive trajectory in older adults

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 2131-2139

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12525

Keywords

Cognitive decline; body mass index; older adults; stability

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [P50 AG005138 AG016976 P30 AG066514, R01 AG034087, R01 AG053446, R01 AG051545, R01 AG061093, AG043878]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Longitudinal data on initially non-demented elderly shows a correlation between changes in BMI and cognitive decline, regardless of baseline BMI category. Stability in BMI predicts better cognitive trajectories, indicating the clinical value in tracking BMI change for potential identification of cognitive decline.
Objective Evidence on simultaneous changes in body mass index (BMI) and cognitive decline, which better reflect the natural course of both health phenomena, is limited. Methods We capitalized on longitudinal data from 15,977 initially non-demented elderly from the Alzheimer's Disease Centers followed for 5 years on average. Changes in BMI were defined as (1) last minus first BMI, (2) mean of all follow-up BMIs minus first BMI, and (3) standard deviation of BMI change from baseline and all follow-up visits (representing variability). Results Participants with significant changes in BMI (increase or decrease of >= 5%), or who had greater variability in BMI, had faster cognitive decline. This pattern was consistent irrespective of normal (BMI < 25; N = 5747), overweight (25 <= BMI < 30; N = 6302), or obese (BMI >= 30; N = 3928) BMI at baseline. Conclusions Stability in BMI predicts better cognitive trajectories suggesting clinical value in tracking BMI change, which is simple to measure, and may point to individuals whose cognition is declining.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available