4.8 Article

Layered Superconductor Cu0.11TiSe2 as a High-Stable K-Cathode

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202109893

Keywords

cathodes; layered structures; potassium-ion batteries; superconductivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20247, 51922038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By controlled intercalation of TiSe2 with Cu, a layered superconductor Cu0.11TiSe2 is obtained, showing improved electron and ion transfer rates and crystal structure stability, greatly enhancing the performance of potassium-ion batteries.
The cathode material is one of the main restricting factors for the development of potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). The poor conductivity, sluggish reaction kinetics, and unstable crystal structure of cathode materials have impeded their electrochemical performance. Here, controlled intercalation of TiSe2 with Cu is used to yield a layered superconductor Cu0.11TiSe2, which exhibits increased electrons and ions transfer rates and improved crystal structure stability. The insertion of Cu not only improves the electronic conductivity and reduces the diffusion barrier but also plays a role in crystal structure support, which further leads to a highly reversible charge and discharge process of Cu0.11TiSe2. The layered superconductor Cu0.11TiSe2 exhibits an excellent cycling performance with a capacity retention of 80% after 300 cycles at a current density of 20 mA g(-1) and a superior rate capability with a capacity of 45 mAh g(-1) at 1000 mA g(-1) (approximate to 8C). Furthermore, a full battery assembled with the Cu0.11TiSe2 cathode and graphite anode exhibits a high reversible capacity of 74 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 20 mA g(-1). This study provides a new path for developing the high-performance cathode material of PIBs and other alkali metal-ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available