4.6 Article

The International Cannabis Toolkit (iCannToolkit): a multidisciplinary expert consensus on minimum standards for measuring cannabis use

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages 1510-1517

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.15702

Keywords

assessment; cannabis; dose; measurement; standardisation; iCanntoolkit

Funding

  1. Society for the Study of Addiction, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Instituto de Salud Carlos III through a 'Juan Rodes' [JR19/00025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of an agreed international minimum approach to measuring cannabis use has hindered the integration of multidisciplinary evidence on the consequences of cannabis use. A group of 25 international expert cannabis researchers convened to discuss a framework for minimum standards to measure cannabis use globally. The expert consensus agreed upon a three-layered hierarchical framework, reflecting different research priorities and standards.
Background The lack of an agreed international minimum approach to measuring cannabis use hinders the integration of multidisciplinary evidence on the psychosocial, neurocognitive, clinical and public health consequences of cannabis use. Methods A group of 25 international expert cannabis researchers convened to discuss a multidisciplinary framework for minimum standards to measure cannabis use globally in diverse settings. Results The expert-based consensus agreed upon a three-layered hierarchical framework. Each layer-universal measures, detailed self-report and biological measures-reflected different research priorities and minimum standards, costs and ease of implementation. Additional work is needed to develop valid and precise assessments. Conclusions Consistent use of the proposed framework across research, public health, clinical practice and medical settings would facilitate harmonisation of international evidence on cannabis consumption, related harms and approaches to their mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available