4.3 Article

Response of hydrological processes to permafrost degradation from 1980 to 2009 in the Upper Yellow River Basin, China

Journal

HYDROLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 1014-1024

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2016.096

Keywords

China; climate warming; hydrological processes; permafrost; response; Upper Yellow River Basin

Funding

  1. National Natural Research Programs of China [41401090, 41571075, 41271079]
  2. One Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [O827611001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Watersheds in cold regions are undergoing climate warming and permafrost degradation, which result in quantitative shifts in surface water groundwater interaction. Daily discharge, annual maximum frozen depth (AMFD) of seasonal frozen soil, precipitation and negative degree-day temperature were analyzed to explore changes and correlations of climate, runoff and permafrost in the Upper Yellow River Basin from 1980 to 2009. Plausible permafrost degradation trends were found at two of the stations, but an unsubstantiated trend was found at Huangheyan Station. The winter recession processes slowed down gradually from 1980 to 2009 at three stations but had little relation to AMFD. Meanwhile, the ratio of monthly maximum to minimum discharge reduced significantly. It is clear that permafrost degradation and runoff variations have already occurred in the basin, particularly in zones where the permafrost coverage is above 40%. It is proposed that the variations in the hydrological regimes were caused by permafrost degradation which enlarged infiltration and sub-surface water contribution to winter discharge. The differences of changes in runoff generation and confluence in various regions were thought to be affected by different permafrost coverage and changes because the exchange of groundwater and surface-water mediated by permafrost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available