4.6 Article

Seasonal dietary shift to zooplankton influences stable isotope ratios and total mercury concentrations in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.))

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 783, Issue 1, Pages 47-63

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-016-2685-y

Keywords

Benthic; delta C-13; C:N ratio; Lipid correction; Liver; Muscle; delta N-15; Pelagic; Tot-Hg

Funding

  1. European Regional Developmental Fund [A30205]
  2. Academy of Finland [1140903, 1268566]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seasonal dietary shifts by Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) are common in subarctic lakes, but less is known about how the shift to pelagic zooplankton feeding during the growing season affects stable isotope ratios and mercury concentrations. We sampled Arctic charr, zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrates from oligotrophic Lake Galggojavri, northern Norway, in June, August and September. Stomach content, age, total length, weight, condition and sex were recorded for all individuals, and liver and muscle tissues were sampled for stable isotope (delta C-13, delta N-15) and total mercury analyses. We predicted that a dietary shift to zooplankton would lead to depleted C-13 and increased mercury levels in charr. Arctic charr consumed benthic prey in June, but shifted to zooplankton feeding in August-September. Stable isotope mixing models revealed increased pelagic reliance towards September. Mercury content in liver increased from June to September, whereas muscle showed opposite trend. In stepwise multiple regression analyses, mercury content in muscle was explained by fish length, month and delta C-13 (R (2) = 0.46), whereas in liver month, delta C-13 and delta N-15 were the main explaining factors (R (2) = 0.69). Seasonal dietary shifts appeared to have an effect on total mercury content in charr, and thus sampling month should be considered when designing future monitoring programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available