3.8 Article

Deep Hybrid Network for Land Cover Semantic Segmentation in High-Spatial Resolution Satellite Images

Journal

INFORMATION
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/info12060230

Keywords

land cover classification; remote sensing; semantic segmentation; deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a hybrid deep learning model that combines the advantages of DenseNet and U-Net for land cover semantic segmentation in high-spatial resolution satellite images. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid network exhibits state-of-the-art performance.
Land cover semantic segmentation in high-spatial resolution satellite images plays a vital role in efficient management of land resources, smart agriculture, yield estimation and urban planning. With the recent advancement in remote sensing technologies, such as satellites, drones, UAVs, and airborne vehicles, a large number of high-resolution satellite images are readily available. However, these high-resolution satellite images are complex due to increased spatial resolution and data disruption caused by different factors involved in the acquisition process. Due to these challenges, an efficient land-cover semantic segmentation model is difficult to design and develop. In this paper, we develop a hybrid deep learning model that combines the benefits of two deep models, i.e., DenseNet and U-Net. This is carried out to obtain a pixel-wise classification of land cover. The contraction path of U-Net is replaced with DenseNet to extract features of multiple scales, while long-range connections of U-Net concatenate encoder and decoder paths are used to preserve low-level features. We evaluate the proposed hybrid network on a challenging, publicly available benchmark dataset. From the experimental results, we demonstrate that the proposed hybrid network exhibits a state-of-the-art performance and beats other existing models by a considerable margin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available