4.7 Article

A Comparison of the neural correlates that underlie rule-based and information-integration category learning

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 3557-3574

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23259

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; learning; verbal; hippocampus; parahippocampal gyrus; caudate nucleus

Funding

  1. South West Doctoral Training Centre (SWDTC) Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Studentship Award [ES/J50015X /1]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [1355970] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influential competition between verbal and implicit systems (COVIS) model proposes that category learning is driven by two competing neural systemsan explicit, verbal, system, and a procedural-based, implicit, system. In the current fMRI study, participants learned either a conjunctive, rule-based (RB), category structure that is believed to engage the explicit system, or an information-integration category structure that is thought to preferentially recruit the implicit system. The RB and information-integration category structures were matched for participant error rate, the number of relevant stimulus dimensions, and category separation. Under these conditions, considerable overlap in brain activation, including the prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, and the hippocampus, was found between the RB and information-integration category structures. Contrary to the predictions of COVIS, the medial temporal lobes and in particular the hippocampus, key regions for explicit memory, were found to be more active in the information-integration condition than in the RB condition. No regions were more activated in RB than information-integration category learning. The implications of these results for theories of category learning are discussed. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3557-3574, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Psychology, Biological

Initial training with difficult items does not facilitate category learning

C. E. R. Edmunds, Andy J. Wills, Fraser Milton

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2019)

Article Psychology, Biological

Automaticity and cognitive control: Effects of cognitive load on cue-controlled reward choice

Tina Seabrooke, Andy J. Wills, Lee Hogarth, Chris J. Mitchell

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2019)

Article Linguistics

Learning from failure: Errorful generation improves memory for items, not associations

Tina Seabrooke, Timothy J. Hollins, Christopher Kent, Andy J. Wills, Chris J. Mitchell

JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE (2019)

Article Energy & Fuels

CFD Simulation of an Industrial Spiral Refrigeration System

A. Khenien, A. Benattayallah, G. Tabor

ENERGIES (2019)

Article Psychology, Biological

Theory Protection in Associative Learning: Humans Maintain Certain Beliefs in a Manner That Violates Prediction Error

Stuart G. Spicer, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Peter M. Jones

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2020)

Article Psychology, Biological

The Effect of Preexposure on Overall Similarity Categorization

Fraser Milton, I. P. L. McLaren, Edward Copestake, David Satherley, Andy J. Wills

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2020)

Article Psychology, Biological

A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning

Andy J. Wills, Lyn Ellett, Fraser Milton, Gareth Croft, Tom Beesley

LEARNING & BEHAVIOR (2020)

Article Psychology

A Cognitive Category-Learning Model of Rule Abstraction, Attention Learning, and Contextual Modulation

Rene Schlegelmilch, Andy J. Wills, Bettina von Helversen

Summary: The Category Abstraction Learning (CAL) model describes category learning through processes of similarity-based generalization and dissimilarity-based abstraction, guided by two attention mechanisms. It explains how rules are learned from scratch and provides explanations for various learning phenomena, challenging existing theories. The model's potential lies in measuring cognitive processes regarding attention, abstraction, error detection, and memorization from multiple psychological perspectives.

PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Angus B. Inkster, Timothy J. Hollins

Summary: The research found that guessing the meanings of unknown words can improve later recognition of their meanings compared to studying alone. The error-correction hypothesis suggests that incorrect guesses can promote memory for the meanings when they are revealed. The experiments showed that guessing has a positive impact on target recognition, but not on associative recognition performance.

MEMORY & COGNITION (2022)

Article Neurosciences

Neural correlates of the inverse base rate effect

Angus B. Inkster, Fraser Milton, Charlotte E. R. Edmunds, Abdelmalek Benattayallah, Andy J. Wills

Summary: The inverse base rate effect is a nonrational behavioral phenomenon in which participants preferentially select outcomes that are different from the base rates. Error-driven learning explains this phenomenon, with brain areas associated with prediction error playing a key role.

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING (2022)

Article Psychology, Biological

Theory Protection: Do Humans Protect Existing Associative Links?

Stuart G. Spicer, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Katie L. Blake, Peter M. Jones

Summary: Theories of associative learning often suggest that learning is influenced by prediction error, but a recent study by Spicer et al. proposes that humans are more likely to attribute surprising outcomes to uncertain cues, in order to maintain confident cue-outcome associations. The findings from the study support this theory, and further experiments compare it to other theories and examine the role of inhibition in learning. The results show that participants learned more about cues with larger prediction errors in inhibition-based learning.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION (2022)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Pre-testing effects are target-specific and are not driven by a generalised state of curiosity

Timothy J. Hollins, Tina Seabrooke, Angus Inkster, Andy Wills, Chris J. Mitchell

Summary: Guessing the answer to a question before seeing the answer can improve memory, known as the pre-testing effect. This effect also occurs in general knowledge learning, where people are more likely to remember information they were curious about. However, the pre-testing effect is not consistent with a general state of curiosity.

MEMORY (2023)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Timothy J. Hollins

Summary: Attempting to retrieve answers during an initial test can improve memory, especially for related word pairs, even if the retrieval attempts are unsuccessful. However, such improvement is not observed for unrelated word pairs. The popular theory that the pretesting effect depends on partial activation of the target during the pretesting phase is challenged by the data.

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2021)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Selective effects of errorful generation on recognition memory: the role of motivation and surprise

Tina Seabrooke, Chris J. Mitchell, Andy J. Wills, Jessica L. Waters, Timothy J. Hollins

MEMORY (2019)

No Data Available