4.7 Article

A proactive task set influences how response inhibition is implemented in the basal ganglia

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 4706-4717

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23338

Keywords

stop-signal; proactive control; reactive inhibition; striatum; subthalamic nucleus

Funding

  1. Research Program of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) [G.0708.14, G.0721.12]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Poles program of the Belgian federal government [P7/11]
  3. Special Research Fund KU Leuven [C16/15/070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing a participant's ability to prepare for response inhibition is known to result in longer Go response times and is thought to engage a top-down fronto-striatal inhibitory task set. This premise is supported by the observation of anterior striatum activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses that focus on uncertain versus certain Go trials. It is assumed that setting up a proactive inhibitory task set also influences how participants subsequently implement stopping. To assess this assumption, we aimed to manipulate the degree of proactive inhibition in a modified stop-signal task to see how this manipulation influences activation when reacting to the Stop cue. Specifically, we tested whether there is differential activity of basal ganglia nuclei, namely the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and anterior striatum, on Stop trials when stop-signal probability was relatively low (20%) or high (40%). Successful stopping was associated with increased STN activity when Stop trials were infrequent and increased caudate head activation when Stop trials were more likely, suggesting a different implementation of reactive response inhibition by the basal ganglia for differing degrees of proactive response control. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4706-4717, 2016. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available