Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: new guidance for publication in BJP
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 14, Pages 3461-3471
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2015-06-27
DOI
10.1111/bph.12856
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- BJP is linking its articles to the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY
- (2015) J C McGrath et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- Transparency in Research involving Animals: The Basel Declaration and new principles for reporting research in BJP manuscripts
- (2015) John C McGrath et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- BJP is changing its requirements for scientific papers to increase transparency
- (2015) J C McGrath et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- Implementing guidelines on reporting research using animals (ARRIVE etc.): new requirements for publication in BJP
- (2015) John C McGrath et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- The fickle P value generates irreproducible results
- (2015) Lewis G Halsey et al. NATURE METHODS
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics
- (2014) Harvey J Motulsky BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
- The Place of Experimental Design and Statistics in the 3Rs
- (2014) R. M. A. Parker et al. ILAR JOURNAL
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- Journals unite for reproducibility
- (2014) NATURE
- Design animal studies better
- (2014) Malcolm R. Macleod NATURE
- Two Years Later: Journals Are Not Yet Enforcing the ARRIVE Guidelines on Reporting Standards for Pre-Clinical Animal Studies
- (2014) David Baker et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Replicated, replicable and relevant–target engagement and pharmacological experimentation in the 21st century
- (2013) Terry Kenakin et al. BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- The use and misuse of statistical methodologies in pharmacology research
- (2013) Michael J. Marino BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- The Lambeth Conventions (II): Guidelines for the study of animal and human ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias
- (2013) Michael J. Curtis et al. PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- Evaluation of Excess Significance Bias in Animal Studies of Neurological Diseases
- (2013) Konstantinos K. Tsilidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death
- (2012) Roy M John et al. LANCET
- Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC
- (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Reliability of 'new drug target' claims called into question
- (2011) Asher Mullard NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis?
- (2010) Stanley E Lazic BMC NEUROSCIENCE
- Influence of blinding sequence of radiographs on the reproducibility and sensitivity to change of joint space width measurement in knee osteoarthritis
- (2010) Déborah Gensburger et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
- Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
- (2010) Carol Kilkenny et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS
- (2008) Sean Scott et al. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started