3.8 Article

Not all clicks are equal: detecting engagement with digital content

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDIA BUSINESS STUDIES
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 90-107

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16522354.2021.1924558

Keywords

User engagement; digital news; user experience; clickstream data

Categories

Funding

  1. Lilly Endowment
  2. Myrta Pulliam Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been found that relying solely on click volume to evaluate digital platforms does not fully capture user engagement. A new systematic approach based on engagement theory can better describe user experiences with digital content and translate these experiences into variables predicting willingness to pay.
Clickstream data recording each click that each individual user makes on a media website has become the currency for evaluating digital platforms in order to maximise advertising and/or subscription revenue. There is a growing recognition, however, that the mere volume of clicks is not adequate for this purpose. We propose a new systematic approach to this problem based on an underlying theory of engagement. Engagement is construed theoretically as user experiences that connect to higher-order personal goals or social values. We show that such experiences can be described qualitatively using survey items that form engagement measurement scales and that these engagement scales, in fact, explain a willingness-to-pay outcome variable. Moreover, these experiences can be translated into surrogate decomposed clickstream variables. We analyse data from three news websites and show that these decomposed clickstream variables predict willingness-to-pay for the sites better than raw, undecomposed clickstream data. Our methodological framework thus provides a new way of using clickstream data to detect engagement with digital content, a method that provides a basis for improving engagement and ultimately outcomes such as the willingness to pay for content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available