3.8 Article

DEMOCRACY AND THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. A CROSS-COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE WITHIN CULTURAL CONTEXT

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 546-573

Publisher

UNIV MALAYSIA SARAWAK, FAC ECONOMICS & BUSINESS
DOI: 10.33736/ijbs.3734.2021

Keywords

Democracy; COVID-19; Culture; High Income; Low Income

Categories

Funding

  1. Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the impact of democracy on the spread of COVID-19, finding that it is beneficial in high-income countries but detrimental in low-income countries. Additionally, cultural dimensions significantly influence people's behavior in relation to the pandemic. The findings have policy implications for improving responses to the pandemic, particularly for vulnerable populations in democracies.
Our paper investigates the influence of democracy upon the spread of COVID-19. For the purpose of our study we use a sample consisting of 185 worldwide countries affected by the spread of the new coronavirus disease (54 high income and 131 low income countries). First, we find that in high income countries, higher levels of democracy reduce the spread of COVID-19 while in the low income countries its influence is exactly the opposite. Second, we find clear evidence that three dimensions of culture (individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity versus femininity) influence people's behaviour in relation with the spread of COVID-19 in a large manner. This study's addressability is wide, from regular people to top policymakers, through their common goal of limiting this pandemic and all the negative effects it brings along. Our findings are important as their policy implications suggest that democracies perform badly for the poorest people and what can be done to improve their record.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available