4.3 Article

Pedestrian crossing decision during flashing green-countdown signal for urban signalized intersection

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 1577-1597

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2021.1949415

Keywords

Travel behavior; pedestrian crossing decision; flashing green-countdown signal; crossing risk; pedestrians' classification

Categories

Funding

  1. 111 project of Sustainable Transportation for Urban Agglomeration in Western China [B20035]
  2. National key research and development program [2019YFB1600500]
  3. Science program of Shaanxi Province [2020JM-222]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD [300102210204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study establishes a decision model of pedestrian crossing based on risk-cost and time-utility during flashing green-countdown signal, dividing pedestrians into different types and establishing crossing decision models for each based on comparison of risk cost and time utility. The accuracy rates of the models for adventurous, ordinary, and conservative pedestrians range from 60% to 90%, indicating their ability to predict decision behavior accurately. Additionally, pedestrians are less sensitive to risk and more sensitive to time when faced with urgent situations.
During the signal-transition period for the signalized intersection, pedestrians will face a dilemma of whether to cross or wait. The study establishes a decision model of pedestrian-crossing based on risk-cost and time-utility during flashing green-countdown signal. First, the calculation methods of potential and direct risk in each direction of the intersection are proposed according to the traffic operation status. Then, analyze the relationship among the arrival time, remaining duration of flashing green signal and the actual crossing behavior, pedestrians are divided into adventurous, ordinary and conservative types respectively. Finally, introducing the time utility function, crossing decision models of three types pedestrians are established respectively based on comparing the risk cost and time utility. Take two signalized intersections as examples, parameters of decision models are calibrated through field investigation. Three types of models' accuracy rates for the adventurous, ordinary and conservative pedestrians are 80%, 90% and 60% respectively, which denotes that the models can accurately predict the decision behavior of adventurous and ordinary pedestrians. Additionally, pedestrians are less sensitive to risk and more sensitive to time when they are faced with urgent time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available