4.3 Article

Revisiting the impact of VR applications on hotel bookings

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 489-511

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JHTT-04-2019-0057

Keywords

PLS-SEM; Virtual reality; S-O-R; Willingness to pay more; Hotel VR application; ????S-O-R????; ???????VR?????; ??????????VR???????; ?????????

Funding

  1. Collins College of Hospitality Management at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the S-O-R framework, this study provides insights into hotel guests' intention to use VR and explores how their intentions lead to their willingness to pay more for a hotel if VR is available during the reservation or hotel selection process.
Purpose The current study aims to investigate hotel guests' intention to use virtual reality (VR) and willingness to pay more for hotels that have VR applications (e.g. virtual room tour) when booking a hotel. Design/methodology/approach Through a theoretical lens of stimuli-organism-response (S-O-R), relationships among an individual's performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, utilitarian motivation, hedonic motivation, perceived value, intention to use VR and willingness to pay more for VR were tested using partial least square-structural equation modeling. Findings Performance expectancy, social influence, utilitarian motivation and hedonic motivation affect the perceived value of VR. An individual's perceived value of VR affects his/her intention to use VR and willingness to pay more for a hotel that has VR contents (e.g. virtual room tour) available during the hotel booking process. Originality/value Through the S-O-R framework, this study provided insights into hotel guests' intention to use VR and explored how their intentions lead to their willingness to pay more for a hotel if VR is available during the reservation or hotel selection process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available