4.4 Article

Clarifying the Predictive Value of Family-Centered Care and Shared Decision Making for Pediatric Healthcare Outcomes Using the Medical Expenditure PanelSurvey

Journal

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 313-345

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12488

Keywords

Family-centered care; health services utilization; medical expenditures; shared decision making; unmet health care needs

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Junior Summer Fellows Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo estimate (1) family-centered care (FCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) prevalence, and (2) associations of FCC and SDM (FCC/SDM) with health care outcomes among U.S. children. Data SourceThe Medical Expenditure PanelSurvey Household Component (MEPS-HC), a nationally representative survey of the noninstitutionalized, civilian population. Study DesignSecondary analyses of prospectively collected data on 15,764 U.S. children were conducted to examine FCC/SDM prevalence in year 1 and associations of FCC/SDM in year 1 with health services utilization, medical expenditures, and unmet health care needs in year 2. Data Collection/Extraction MethodsWe combined four MEPS-HC longitudinal files from 2007 to 2011. Principal FindingsFCC/SDM prevalence in year 1 varied from 38.6 to 93.7 percent, and it was lower for composites with more stringent scoring approaches. FCC/SDM composites with stringent scoring approaches in year 1 were associated with reduced unmet needs in year 2. FCC/SDM, across all year 1 composites, was not associated with health services utilization or medical expenditures in year 2. FCC/SDM year 1 subcomponents describing consensus building and mutual agreement were consistently associated with unmet health care needs in year 2. ConclusionsFCC/SDM composites with stringent scoring approaches measuring consensus building and mutual agreement may have the greatest utility for pediatric health care quality improvement efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available